Quantcast
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 14

Three things to love about GMAT Roman numeral problems

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
blog-numerals
I. Roman numeral Quant problems aren’t a whole lot of fun.

II. A lot of my students choose to skip them entirely, which is much smarter than wasting five minutes wondering what to do!

III. However, it’s possible to turn this rare and tricky problem type into an opportunity.

Read on, and learn why many GMAT high-scorers love Roman numeral problems.

Reason 1: They’re always easier than they look.

Roman numeral problems are a little bit like Data Sufficiency problems. The difficulty usually doesn’t come from the math itself; it comes from complicated logic and deliberately obscure writing. You should always start a tricky-looking Data Sufficiency problem by translating and simplifying the problem, and you can do the same on Roman numeral problems.

Here’s a problem from the GMAC’s GMATPrep software.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Roman_Numeral_Problem

 

At first glance, this problem is a mess. If you simplify the problem before you begin approaching it, though, you’ll discover a much easier problem underlying it. Start with the question stem, just like in Data Sufficiency:

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Roman_Numeral_Inequality_1

 

 

 

 

 

Then, simplify the statements, starting with the first:

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Roman_Numeral_Inequality_2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The first statement actually simplifies to exactly what you’re given in the question itself, so it must be true. As an exercise, simplify the second statement in the same way. It simplifies to ad > bc, which isn’t true.

At this point, you know that the right answer must include I, and it can’t include II. You could move on and simplify the third, much more complex statement, but do you really have to?

Reason 2: There’s partial credit.

Well, not technically. But take another look at those answer choices.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Roman_Numeral_Choices

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You can actually eliminate all but two of them. Only (B) and (E) meet the criteria of including Roman numeral I, but not including Roman numeral II. If you’re quick enough with algebra, you could get to this point 1 minute into the problem — and a 50/50 guess after 1 minute beats a definitive answer after 3 minutes, when it comes to maximizing your final score. Since Roman numeral problems often have one or two statements that are much simpler than the others, they represent a fantastic opportunity to take a good guess quickly.

But if you’ve got plenty of time to solve a Roman numeral problem all the way through, what do you do?

Reason 3: Testing easy cases works really well.

I mentioned above that the difficulty of Roman Numeral problems doesn’t usually come from the math. When you test cases, you’ll rarely be tripped up by tough arithmetic or lengthy calculations. Plus, problems are often designed so that it’s clear what cases you should test. When they aren’t, you can sometimes get enough information by just testing a simple case at random. Try that approach with the third statement.

Since ad < bc, choose the following values:

a = 1                       b = 2

d = 1                      c = 2

Then, plug those values into statement III:

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Roman_Numeral_Fractions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Since that isn’t true, statement III doesn’t have to be true. The correct answer to the problem is (B) I only. The thing to notice here is how straightforward it was to test that case — and how, unlike in Data Sufficiency, testing just one case sometimes gives you all the information you need.

What to do next

Roman numeral problems are rare on the GMAT. There’s no reason to spend hours studying them, since you might not see even a single one on any given Quant section. That said, they’re sometimes easier than they look! After reading this article, you have all of the basic tools you need to approach most Roman numeral problems. To test them out, try the following problems from the Official Guide to the GMAT, 2016: Problem Solving 66, 96, and 107.


Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Chelsey-Cooley
Chelsey Cooley is a Manhattan Prep instructor based in Seattle, Washington. Chelsey always followed her heart when it came to her education. Luckily, her heart led her straight to the perfect background for GMAT and GRE teaching: she has undergraduate degrees in mathematics and history, a master’s degree in linguistics, a 790 on the GMAT, and a perfect 170/170 on the GRE. Check out Chelsey’s upcoming GMAT prep offerings here.

The post Three things to love about GMAT Roman numeral problems appeared first on GMAT.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 14

Trending Articles